Is High Tech High the most innovative school in the US?

November 13, 2009 at 2:52 pm 7 comments

By David Jackson

When Larry Rosenstock and Ted Sizer were contemplating the blueprint for the first High Tech High school ten years ago, they debated the measure by which they would want to be judged.

 They asked themselves: why does it seem impossible for all children in a mixed community to go to University? They decided University admission would be the test by which they would judge their new school.

High Tech High went on to pass with flying colours: since the first school opened, 99.5% of students have gone to University. Examined in detail, the figures are even more remarkable: 55% of students are the first generation in their family to attend University. 88% of their poorer students on free or reduced school dinners complete a University degree. These numbers are hard to ignore.Larry Rosenstock is now Chief Executive of High Tech High, a group of nine Charter schools in San Diego (one elementary, three middle and five high schools), each containing no more than 400 students. Rosenstock spoke at the Guardian/Innovation Unit ‘Innovation in Education’ conference on 9 November, and the Learning Futures national event the following day. I saw him both times – I’ve also been to San Diego to see High Tech High in action, and it is quite possibly the most impressive and the most innovative school I have ever seen. So what makes it so different?

An innovative curriculum

The High Tech High curriculum supports personalised, project-based learning with pervasive connections to the community. Visit the schools, and you see every available surface covered with the students’ projects – which are regularly showcased to the wider community in popular open-house events, as well as other public spaces.

 Everything starts with student engagement. Students are given the satisfaction of thinking, making and doing. The learning is personalised and integrates the rigour of academic content with the application of vocational pedagogy – hence their name High Tech High. 

Learners as producers

“Kids do production not consumption” at High Tech High. As Rosenstock says, “High quality work means high quality teaching – we let practice speak through demonstrations of student work.” Several student projects have been published, and are available in bookshops (and on Amazon) – for example, Perspectives of San Diego Bay (a biology field guide to the bay) and Calculicious (a collection of artwork by students that explores calculus).

Learning disciplines

They do not focus on standardized tests, which “suck oxygen out of the system”. Learning is about enquiry, collaboration, kids doing and making and shaping things. “Memorising 500 biology words makes people think that they don’t want to be biologists. Behaving like a biologist does. Our students behave like mathematicians or historians or photographers or writers. They are encouraged to think like someone who learns for a living.”

Small Schools

They are small schools so that students are known – and Bill Gates, whose Foundation has supported the Small Schools movement across America, is a huge supporter of High Tech High, which he says shows that “You can work hard and have fun”.

 So, how do they make it work?

 Rich descriptions of innovative practice sometimes fail to identify the critical building blocks – the way something is organised, the systems, and management practices that enables astonishing educational achievement to happen. Some of these building blocks at High Tech High, in addition to their own outstanding leadership, include the following:

  • All lessons are collaboratively planned and they build from teacher and student passions (see ‘Where Do Projects Come From?’ or ‘Into the World of Projects’ ).
  • Nothing changes for student learners unless staff are also learning together, so “Students learn in teams and teachers learn in teams”. The school year begins with a two or three week ‘Odyssey’ during which staff work and learn together in collaborative teams to undertake a curriculum project that students will do later that year. At the end they present their work. Together, they learn the pedagogical models that they will use with their students.
  • More unusually, staff engage in one hour’s professional development before school every day. During this time they plan together, they study student work and they observe themselves teaching. They have examined staff learning time, and it discovered that it works best at the start of the day, not the end (for obvious reasons). Larry Rosenstock believes that the cumulative effect of this learning time is much more important than any set of formal qualifications the teachers might have.
  • There are also two full-time videographers, so they are able constantly to study teachers teaching and students learning, and to refine and problem-solve their practices.
  • Assessment is ‘authentic’ – including presentation, exhibition, performance in front of peers, family and the community.
  • Staff design the adult learning materials for their credentialing programmes and their Masters programmes. They produce their own in-house education journal called ‘Unboxed’  and all work – teacher and student work – is public and available for others to learn from. Anyone visiting the High Tech High site can access this rich resource (and you can watch a series of videos, too)
  • In addition, staff (like students) are recognized both as producers – all syllabi and portfolios of work are online and publicly available from the school’s digital commons , and as learners – High Tech High school certifies its own teachers, and provides Masters-level programmes both for its own teachers and for others.

Teachers routinely craft lessons that blend subjects. Teacher loyalty is not to other teachers who teach the same subject as them, but to other teachers who teach the same students at the same time. That way the gates are open for the planning of integrated work programmes. It is customary, therefore, to timetable together groups of students with small teams of teachers who plan together and make public their work plans. The quality of these curricular and pedagogic designs are subsequently judged by the outcomes of student work. Some work better than others, but that is how they learn.

As a result, teachers want to work at High Tech High. They receive hundreds of applications for every vacancy, yet no-one has tenure – not Larry Rosenstock nor any other teacher (“Why would you want to retain a teacher who can’t produce outstanding student work?”).  

So what is the big idea?

At the core of High Tech High is a philosophy of integration. “At High Tech High we are committed to desegregating kids. We are committed to both a diverse and an integrated community in which all students follow College graduation programmes.” Integration begins with the community, but it goes much further. They integrate:

  • across social class (following Thomas Jefferson’s belief that the purpose of public education is both to serve the public and to create a public)
  • school and community – in Rosenstock’s words, “You don’t want to isolate school from the community kids are going out into. You want the walls to be as permeable as possible, with adults coming in and learning going out.”
  • public and private – because San Diego business leaders are stakeholders in the schools’ success.
  • secondary and post-secondary education, assuming that all students have the potential to progress to College if they choose. (Rosenstock cites his grandmother: “There are two kinds of people, those who think that there are two kinds of people and those who don’t.”)
  • head and hand (following John Dewey’s belief that understanding derives from activity; from making and doing)
  • learning with assessment.

This set out to be a provocation piece, but the provocation lies not so much in the argument as in the evidence of an alternative approach to secondary schooling that produces extraordinary results.

High Tech High has turned away from much of what is outdated and self-defeating about traditional schooling –  classroom design, divisions between subjects, isolation from the community, limiting belief systems about student potential, assessments that only one teacher ever sees, a model of school that fails to inspire and develop staff.

Having found such a model, are we in the UK able to learn from and seek to emulate the ambition and the passion and the practices of High Tech High?  It is not the only successful alternative model for secondary schools, but it is one that is within our grasp.

If you are a school leader in the UK, and you want to apply this learning, where would you start?

Larry’s advice is clear: he would divide the school internally into small schools of 400 students. He would identify outstanding teacher leaders to lead those small schools, together with a small design team. He would agree with them some defining values and some key principles, and then he would liberate them to design and define their curriculum and pedagogy. He would support this with resources – time to collaborate and to recognise their leadership roles. He would set a workshop date when they would all present their school designs (in a collaborative learning setting) and he would know that they would be very different – and after the group had modified each other’s designs he would accept them all and liberate their creativity to implement them, so creating an internally diverse set of designs, bound by common principles, from which they could learn.

Read more about Larry Rosenstock and High Tech High here.

Advertisements

Entry filed under: Education & Children's Services, Innovation Policy, Innovation Worldwide, Schools & Multi-School Trusts.

Where innovation works: Sweden and Finland John Lewis vs Easyjet

7 Comments Add your own

  • 1. Damien Graham  |  November 14, 2009 at 11:25 am

    This. Is a fascinating article and a model that we could follow in the UK with a bit of imagination. If there were to be a change in government next year, would such an approach to pedagogy be possible?

    Reply
  • 2. David Price  |  November 16, 2009 at 11:38 am

    Damien,
    I’m not convinced a different administration would make much difference, at least to mainstream schools. Larry’s schools are Charter Schools and appear to have similar freedoms to our Academies.
    However, through the Learning Futures project, (www.learningfutures.org) we hope to establish a close working relationship between Learning Futures schools and H-T-H. So maybe we’ll be able to get as much of these innovations in place as possible!

    Reply
    • 3. Damien Graham  |  November 25, 2009 at 7:59 pm

      Thanks for this David,
      How many schools are involved in the Learning Futures Project and how could school become involved?
      Damien

      Reply
      • 4. alecpatton  |  December 1, 2009 at 12:56 pm

        Damien – at the moment, by far the best way to get involved with Learning Futures is to join the Community of Interest – you can do this by going to our website, http://www.learningfutures.org/, and adding your email where it says ‘sign up here for updates’ in the top righthand corner.

  • 5. Stephen Murtagh  |  November 18, 2009 at 10:42 am

    I was very impressed with some key aspects of High Tech High and some elements that we could put into place in this country. The idea of having smaller units either within the school or by creating smaller schools is critical. Young poeple need to feel that they belong to a small community in which they are well known.

    I also think another key element is staff having quality time to work together on a daily and weekly basis. This is very important and would change schools very quickly.

    I think the aspect of having a balance of young people from a variety of social classes and backgrounds is vital and our primary and secondary schools are often neighbourhood schools that often serve a community that is not as diverse as it should be and often dominated by one single estate or an area of deprivation which undermines the support of middle class parents. Parental support for the school is often weak as they do not see the aspirations of some of the students meet the aspirations thay have for their children.

    I think an idea that we could put in place quickly is the idea that all work is presented in some format to parents and the wider community. That seems to have had a dramatic effect in San Diego and one that could raise the quality of work.

    Reply
  • 6. Shirley.T  |  December 13, 2009 at 11:44 am

    Many schools are encouraging young people to make the most of their talents , watch a recent film documentary, I think is a very good movie for this generation, stories of successful curriculum innovation, young entrepreneurs of this nation today share their unconventional journey..”The YES Movie”produced by Louis Lautman ,
    http://www.TheYESmovie.com

    Reply
  • […] High schools in San Diego. I've written about the High Tech High philosophy before, as have my colleagues at the Innovation Unit. But it's easy to be radical in theory, less so in practice.So, to […]

    Reply

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s

Trackback this post  |  Subscribe to the comments via RSS Feed


The Innovation Unit website

Enter your email address to subscribe to this blog and receive notifications of new posts by email.

Join 29 other followers

Archives

Twitter Updates

Follow innovation_unit on Twitter

%d bloggers like this: