Could a 16th century metaphor point the way to 21st century learning?

September 19, 2010 at 4:02 pm 3 comments

In the Learning Futures programme, we’ve been doing a lot of thinking, and writing, about the idea of schools as ‘Learning Commons’.

By using the metaphor of the commons, we’re hoping to encourage people to see the purpose of schooling in a different light. Historically, ‘commons’ has been used to define land which is a shared resource to which everyone has equal access, balanced by equal responsibility for its sustainability. The ‘tragedy of the commons’, refers to the detrimental effects of self-interest and over-exploitation of common land, which created a justification for fencing off land into separate ‘enclosures’.

The ‘tragedy of the learning commons’ could be seen as our inability to see  beyond the demands of the industrial revolution – sadly, those factory schools are still with us, hence Anthony Seldon’s recent call for their end. Schools, during the 20th century, became progressively more ‘enclosed’: 10 separate subjects, carefully separated classrooms, and a gradual fencing-off of schools from their communities.

The world doesn’t work like that anymore – in the real world, we learn in cross-disciplinary teams, we’re constantly connected, even though we don’t share the same physical space, and we desperately need learning to reconnect with community. It’s one reason why students have become disengaged: they can’t see how learning  will improve where they live, and the people they live with.

We’re lucky to have great schools involved in Learning Futures, and they share three cultures which seem to make them engaged, and engaging, places to learn:
1. A culture of co-construction – students have a vested interest in what, and how they learn, because they helped to design it;
2. A culture of collaborative enquiry – students, staff, parents/carers, and community groups are all invited to see learning as a shifting, developing, responsive activity, not as tablets of truth, dispensed by ‘the experts’. The process of learning becomes the shared obsession.
3 A culture of democratic community –  more than just a nod to  ‘student voice’, the great schools operate on a human scale, fuelled by mutual respect. They are inescapably hierarchical places, but the edifice won’t collapse if students offer observations on the quality of the teaching they’re getting.

When schools become learning commons, all kinds of benefits follow. School becomes a base-camp for learning, not the destination. Students are able to learn in all kinds of places, setting out from, and coming back to, the classroom, but not held captive there. And all those people who are welcomed into the commons (external experts, mentors and coaches) mean that teachers are no longer the (over-exploited) funnels through which all teaching and learning must pass. Instead they become managers of a diverse set of learning relationships, including the learning which takes place informally – with friends, at home, or online.

Trying to re-imagine schools as learning commons may seem anachronistic, but education is one of the few areas of 21st century life where the commons isn’t being talked about, and fought over: think copyright, the environment,  politics (as we saw recently with Wikileak’s Pentagon papers), and of course, the internet itself.

So why not education? Chris Anderson (TED curator) recently spoke about the incredible power of online video as a tool for learning. But it is just a tool, one mechanism which can help promote a ‘global learning commons’ (remember you heard it here first, folks).

We’ll be publishing more on school as learning commons and school as base-camp in the next Learning Futures pamphlet, due out in a few weeks. In the meantime, help me out. Does the concept of the learning commons work for you? Does it help you see the future of enlightened learning, or is it an anachronistic distraction? Is it confusing, or is it just, well, common sense?

(Sorry, I couldn’t resist, it was just sitting there….)

David Price

Advertisements

Entry filed under: Education & Children's Services, Schools & Multi-School Trusts.

IU’s whirlwind Early Years tour of Britain Social Innovation – The Danish Context

3 Comments Add your own

  • 1. John D Peatfield  |  September 21, 2010 at 9:12 am

    Hi David – you and your Learning Futures colleagues (Alec Patton and I have chatted about this link in the context of the Bydales 6 views and WWF partnership) will be interested in this 2009 paper by Prof Mark Van Vugt on the ‘Triumph of the Commons’.

    Mark Van Vugt sets out some the key characteristics and influences from social psychology that may be brought into our educational practices to assist in development.

    This work has influenced mythinking and work – we have a bid into Natural England’s Access to Nature funding where we use Van Vugt’s 4i’s as part of the project design; and in the near future I will work with students, staff and governors at Bydales to see if we can use this to enhance their development of education for sustainable development.

    We will report on the Bydales ideas soon and we are awaiting bid outcomes in the next 2 weeks !!

    If we use this paper and ideas as a starting point we can blog about their relevance and potential impact

    A copy of the paper can be accessed through this link http://www.psychologicalscience.org/journals/cd/18_3_inpress/vanvugt.pdf

    cheers John

    Reply
  • 2. Rob Riordan  |  September 21, 2010 at 8:45 pm

    David,

    At High Tech High, in every one of our schools, we’ve got what we call the commons—a space, visible and accessible from the entry area, that belongs to everyone. And the reference is deliberate to what we Yanks think of as the New England commons. But I like your figurative extension of it better. We talk about making permeable the walls between school and community, but it’s much richer to see our commons as a metaphor for everything we do. Yes, it makes common sense!

    Your three cultures make sense, too, and square with our aspirations around voice, choice, collegial pedagogy, and community.

    I’m circulating your post to my colleagues here. Thanks!
    Rob

    Reply
    • 3. David Price  |  September 21, 2010 at 9:31 pm

      Rob,
      Good to see it works for you. It’s just one of four practices that we think make up an ‘engaged school’ with engaged students. We just happen to think that High Tech High schools embody all four elements.
      More to come in our next pamphlet.

      Reply

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s

Trackback this post  |  Subscribe to the comments via RSS Feed


The Innovation Unit website

Enter your email address to subscribe to this blog and receive notifications of new posts by email.

Join 29 other followers

Archives

Twitter Updates

Follow innovation_unit on Twitter

%d bloggers like this: